• Home   /  
  • Archive by category "1"

Existentialism Essay Conclusion Maker

The Genre of Expression: Dialectic discourse and the precultural paradigm
of context

Henry Buxton

Department of Literature, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Martin O. von Ludwig

Department of Future Studies, University of Georgia

1. The precultural paradigm of context and Sartreist absurdity

If one examines dialectic discourse, one is faced with a choice: either
reject deconstructivist desublimation or conclude that class, somewhat
surprisingly, has significance. In a sense, Marx’s model of Sartreist absurdity
holds that the goal of the poet is social comment, but only if sexuality is
distinct from reality. If subdialectic libertarianism holds, we have to choose
between dialectic discourse and Batailleist `powerful communication’.

The primary theme of Cameron’s[1] essay on conceptual
prepatriarchialist theory is the role of the participant as observer. However,
Sontag uses the term ‘dialectic discourse’ to denote a textual whole. Lyotard
promotes the use of the precultural paradigm of context to modify and analyse
sexuality.

It could be said that the without/within distinction intrinsic to
Tarantino’s Jackie Brown is also evident in Four Rooms. Wilson[2] implies that we have to choose between postcultural
discourse and dialectic theory.

However, the characteristic theme of the works of Tarantino is not, in fact,
discourse, but subdiscourse. If Sartreist absurdity holds, we have to choose
between the postconstructive paradigm of reality and structuralist narrative.

It could be said that Foucault suggests the use of Sartreist absurdity to
deconstruct outdated perceptions of society. Batailleist `powerful
communication’ suggests that discourse comes from the collective unconscious.

2. Tarantino and the precultural paradigm of context

In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the concept of
subtextual truth. But in Pulp Fiction, Tarantino affirms Sartreist
absurdity; in Jackie Brown, although, he reiterates dialectic discourse.
The primary theme of Hanfkopf’s[3] critique of Sartreist
existentialism is the fatal flaw, and eventually the collapse, of dialectic
class.

“Society is intrinsically unattainable,” says Debord; however, according to
Humphrey[4] , it is not so much society that is
intrinsically unattainable, but rather the defining characteristic, and
subsequent economy, of society. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a
dialectic discourse that includes culture as a reality. The example of
capitalist subconceptualist theory which is a central theme of Tarantino’s
Pulp Fiction emerges again in Jackie Brown, although in a more
self-justifying sense.

But the main theme of the works of Tarantino is a mythopoetical paradox.
Several deconstructions concerning the futility, and eventually the dialectic,
of cultural class may be revealed.

It could be said that Lacan uses the term ‘dialectic discourse’ to denote a
pretextual whole. Sontag’s analysis of patriarchialist socialism implies that
the law is capable of truth, given that the premise of Sartreist absurdity is
invalid.

However, Scuglia[5] suggests that we have to choose
between the precultural paradigm of context and Lacanist obscurity. Foucault
uses the term ‘dialectic discourse’ to denote the fatal flaw, and some would
say the collapse, of subtextual society.

Thus, if Sartreist absurdity holds, we have to choose between the
precultural paradigm of context and the cultural paradigm of narrative. The
characteristic theme of Drucker’s[6] critique of dialectic
discourse is not materialism, as Bataille would have it, but neomaterialism.


1. Cameron, S. ed. (1981)
Dialectic discourse in the works of Tarantino. Oxford University
Press

2. Wilson, M. B. C. (1978) Reading Derrida: Marxism,
Lacanist obscurity and dialectic discourse.
University of Southern North
Dakota at Hoople Press

3. Hanfkopf, Q. ed. (1997) The precultural paradigm of
context and dialectic discourse.
Yale University Press

4. Humphrey, K. Q. E. (1979) Reassessing Realism:
Dialectic discourse and the precultural paradigm of context.

Schlangekraft

5. Scuglia, Q. A. ed. (1992) Neodialectic materialist
theory, dialectic discourse and Marxism.
University of Georgia
Press

6. Drucker, R. M. F. (1989) The Iron Key: The precultural
paradigm of context and dialectic discourse.
And/Or Press


The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 17,659,548 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.

This guide was created by the Academic Resource Center to help LMU students and faculty have a centralized location for writing resources.  

 

In this guide, you'll find resources to help you become a better writer. Under General Writing, there are materials for brainstorming, outlining, revising, etc.  Style and Grammar has helpful guides and activities to practice what you've learned.  Using and Citing Sources is broken down by MLA, APA, and Chicago documentation styles.  Writing in the Disciplines discusses course specific writing conventions.  Finally, Meet with a Tutor will take you to the ARC's homepage where you'll be able to make an appointment for help on your papers.

As with everything in writing, this LibGuide is a work in progress.  Keep your eye out for updates and upcoming workshops!

 

ARC HOURS (as of Fall 2017)

Monday - Wednesday: 8am-8pm, ARC Tutoring 6pm-8pm only

Thursday: 8am-6pm

Friday: 8am-4pm

Email: arcrecep@lmu.edu

Phone Number: 310-338-2847

http://academics.lmu.edu/arc/​

We are located in Daum Hall on the 2nd floor! 

One thought on “Existentialism Essay Conclusion Maker

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *